Thank you for Subscribing to Utilities Business Review Weekly Brief
Water Reuse and Smart Monitoring Change the Treatment-Chemistry Model
Utilities Business Review | Thursday, August 27, 2026
Water treatment chemicals and solutions are increasingly linked to water reclamation and monitoring, as industries and municipalities are exploring means to lessen dependency on fresh water. Water shortage, effluent limitations, and sustainability requirements are driving treatment processes toward real-time monitoring and better control over the chemicals used.
The broader water and wastewater treatment market is expected to grow from USD 332.84 billion in 2026 to about USD 584.63 billion by 2035, supported by global water stress, urbanization and rising demand for treated water. This creates a larger setting for chemical suppliers that can support reuse-ready treatment programs.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Reuse changes the chemistry conversation. Water that once would have been discharged may need to meet a quality level suitable for cooling, irrigation, process use or environmental return. That requires tighter control over suspended solids, microbes, scaling, corrosion and organic loading. Treatment programs must be designed around the intended reuse pathway.
According to market guidance for 2026 water treatment trends for industrial and municipal treatment, the key areas of focus will be polyaluminium chloride, polyacrylamide, water reuse, disinfection, ESG, and sustainability. The trend reflects the way that chemical programs have started to be viewed as part of efficiency and resource management.
Smart monitoring is helping in this transition. State-of-the-art treatment technologies have the capability of using sensor-based technologies, automated dosage, and analytics to optimize the amount of chemicals used based on the actual condition of the water being treated.
The main topics that the wastewater technologies for 2026 have included are AI-driven automation, high-level membrane processes, digital twin technology, PFAS removal techniques, and decentralization. These technological advances can be effectively used to design more accurate wastewater treatment processes in conjunction with on-field expertise by chemists.
The challenge is integration. The facility may have installed sensors, but not the personnel needed to analyze the data or change treatment procedures. The chemicals vendor may provide excellent products, but inadequate IT capabilities. Customers increasingly need partners that can connect chemistry, equipment and monitoring into one service model.
Research into predictive control for wastewater treatment has also shown how plants can be managed around different water-quality targets while supporting resource recovery goals. While advanced control is not yet universal, it points to a future where treatment chemistry is adjusted around reuse objectives and energy performance.
The economic case will vary by sector. A data center, food processor or manufacturing plant may justify reuse investment if water availability affects expansion. A municipality may focus on resilience, discharge reduction or long-term supply planning. Solution providers must tailor the business case to each customer.
The next phase of water treatment will likely favor firms that combine chemistry with digital oversight and reuse planning. Customers want fewer surprises, better water recovery and clearer proof that treatment programs are working.
Water treatment chemicals and solutions are becoming part of smarter water resource management. Their value will be measured by whether they help organizations reuse more water while maintaining reliable quality and controlled chemical use.
More in News
Maintenance schedules now play a bigger role in shaping competition among gas turbine replacement parts companies. Buyers usually start looking for components long before planned outages, so preparation becomes a key part of how suppliers are chosen. In practice, purchasing decisions are starting to reflect how well suppliers support maintenance planning, not just the replacement part itself.
Planned outages offer little flexibility once equipment is taken out of service. Maintenance teams have to work within set schedules, and these depend on replacement parts arriving as planned. If there are delays at this stage, inspection activities can be affected or equipment downtime can stretch beyond what was originally planned.
This has increased attention on supplier responsiveness before purchase orders are placed. Buyers frequently ask technical questions during the planning stage because they want to reduce uncertainty before maintenance begins. Product documentation and engineering support often become part of supplier comparisons, particularly when turbines have remained in service for many years.
The replacement parts companies can compete with each other on the ability to support long maintenance planning horizons. The negotiations with such suppliers usually begin earlier than the initiation of the manufacturing process. The buyers need time to study the contract specifications and organize their maintenance efforts. This way, they can complete all the necessary technical assessments before the scheduled date of an equipment outage.
The competition is based on the service suppliers’ ability to manage any communication issues that may arise during the purchasing process. Since the maintenance planning process is continuous, the buyers often have engineering-related questions even after a purchase has been made. Thus, those who can provide the necessary support during the preparation process for a greater number of days will be more competitive.
The growing emphasis on maintenance scheduling does not necessarily change the engineering requirements for replacement parts. It changes the conditions under which purchasing decisions are made. Suppliers are increasingly evaluated on how well they fit into carefully planned maintenance programs where timing is closely monitored.
Gas turbine replacement parts companies are likely to see continued attention on planning support as maintenance schedules remain tightly managed. Buyers appear to be placing greater importance on predictability throughout procurement because successful outages depend on preparation well before equipment is taken offline.
...Read more
When purchasing gas turbine replacement parts, cost continues to be a crucial factor. However, buyers are prioritizing the overall purchasing process prior to approval. Procurement teams are emphasizing documentation, manufacturing processes, and delivery commitments for replacement parts due to the extensive maintenance process that is usually pre-planned.
Companies are looking more closely at how they choose suppliers for gas turbine replacement parts, particularly when the equipment has been running for many years. Concerns about compatibility can lead to extra technical reviews before the buying process begins. Buyers are asking for clear and complete information from suppliers to help ensure the parts will fit as expected and avoid confusion during installation.
Buyers are taking a closer look at potential suppliers because the equipment being maintained needs to get back online quickly. Teams are reviewing documentation and manufacturing steps in detail. Any delay or missing paperwork can add time to the maintenance schedule and interrupt operations. These risks are now part of the overall procurement review, not just something separate from cost.
The buying process may comprise engineering teams that scrutinize specifications prior to finalizing the purchase. Technical aspects of the procurement process contribute to the overall decision-making, particularly since the gas turbine equipment being maintained requires extensive maintenance programs to resume operations. Documentation on manufacturing or identification of components can facilitate faster decision-making by removing uncertainties about the installation process.
Suppliers of gas turbine replacement parts should recognize that buyers are bringing in more technical expertise during the purchasing process to make later operations smoother. Technical questions come up often, especially for parts used in older equipment that has been running for a long time. These questions can start before the purchase contract is even signed. Responding to these concerns can help buyers get internal approvals more quickly.
Procurement practices within the maintenance sector remain significantly influenced by the nature of gas turbine maintenance programs. In particular, buyers are considering communication during the purchasing process a critical component of procurement, including technical concerns that may arise long after the initial request for quotation. Addressing documentation needs during the purchasing stage facilitates faster decision-making, particularly when considering the extensive maintenance programs for gas turbines.
In general, it is evident that gas turbine replacement parts suppliers will need to provide comprehensive information about the procurement process to meet the emerging buyer expectations. The purchasing process for such equipment is increasingly becoming a technical assessment of a supplier’s readiness to support the buyer’s maintenance program rather than the traditional buying practice.
...Read more
Unexpected expenses during maintenance are the nemesis of any facility relying on gas turbines for electricity or industrial production. Direct replacement of the turbine by newer technology is rarely considered an option in the short term, especially when the existing equipment can still provide an acceptable power output after repairs. These factors contribute to the rising demand for replacement parts for gas turbines and their planners’ growing focus on pre-outage purchasing options.
Gas turbine replacement parts providers operate in a market where the customer’s priority is finding the right spare parts supplier. The planned maintenance and replacement downtime are limited by the moment when the equipment is taken offline for servicing. Therefore, buyers need to secure the possibility of a part replacement without delay at the moment of equipment shutdown, which creates additional pressure on the purchasing decision-making process.
In addition to the obvious aging of the equipment, the necessity for its further use dictates the choice of what components can be serviced in place and which ones are to be replaced by their modern equivalents at the moment of turbine downtime. Replacement parts suppliers play an important role in the timing of purchase and equipment maintenance, which should be taken into account when planning the work and selecting the parts.
Therefore, the gas turbine parts market is distinguished by the special importance of the lead time and, consequently, the reliability of replacement suppliers and their delivery schedules. Delays in the delivery of a single component can have negative consequences for the entire maintenance schedule, causing additional expenses while the equipment is out of service. When choosing between potential suppliers, buyers compare their qualifications based on documentation, manufacturing practices, and expectations about the supply schedule rather than focusing on price differences.
Engineering documentation becomes even more important in such transactions since the replacement components must satisfy the requirements described earlier. Thus, the technical specifications and general characteristics of equipment are of great importance to the buyer, for which the spare parts suppliers act as replacements for their own engineering services. This circumstance highlights the importance of reliable supplier support for the uninterrupted maintenance and continued operation of the turbine.
Finally, the study also shows that the discussion of these factors does not relate only to the specific details of the gas turbine. Potential suppliers can highlight their strengths in other areas, for example, in providing qualified answers to questions from buyers and technical documentation of supplied goods. This factor is critical to the purchasing party when calculating the risks associated with a planned maintenance schedule, during which the equipment may be out of service for an extended period.
...Read more
Utility vegetation management (UVM) research has traditionally focused on pragmatic and cost-effective solutions, evolving incrementally to address emerging operational needs. Foundational and often long-term studies have established the basis for the prescriptive methodologies widely used in the industry today. However, as the sector encounters increasing challenges from the diverse effects of climate change, workforce limitations, and tighter economic constraints, there is an urgent need for a shift in research focus. Modern UVM research must emphasize direct, outcome-driven evaluations that rigorously assess return on investment (ROI) and provide solution-oriented strategies. This approach will enable utilities to improve efficiency and resilience in an increasingly complex environment.
Adaptive research conducted in close partnership with utility companies is particularly advantageous in this context. Utilities are increasingly taking the initiative to address their inquiries as collaborative relationships expand. This change can be attributed to the emergence of innovative tools that enable utilities to devise solutions swiftly, often utilizing internal resources in conjunction with external partners and consultants.
Progress in UVM research, alongside the necessity for more efficient resource allocation, is evident in the development of workflow software, LiDAR and satellite analytics, biodiversity assessments, and safety initiatives. Furthermore, technological innovations provide immediate solutions and may play a crucial role in steering the industry forward as we adapt to change and strive to enhance our return on investments, particularly in light of the growing demands for electrification within the sector.
Focusing on Biodiversity and Sustainability
As we progress within our industry and navigate the complexities of contemporary challenges, we must consider factors such as biodiversity levels along our rights-of-way (ROWs) and, in certain instances, the adjacent land areas. These considerations are crucial in our greening initiatives and corporate sustainability efforts, particularly as we foster relationships with the communities we serve.
The significance of biodiversity permeates our core operations as we increasingly focus on ROWs situated in ecologically sensitive regions while conserving and acknowledging rare and endangered plant species and engaging with other vulnerable sites. Integrating technological innovations to collaborate with various entities, including state and federal agencies, will enhance our ability to find and uphold necessary protocols. Working alongside these regulatory bodies will facilitate the development of proactive solutions and strengthen relationships among cross-agency and multidisciplinary teams.
Additionally, the intersection of urban forests and ROWs is gaining recognition. Advancements in research within the utility sector and refined tools designed with Urban Vegetation Management (UVM) objectives are now being applied to the urban forestry (UF) sector. This progress is driven by the need to comprehend the advantages of canopy management and the care of canopies, particularly in regions where utility UVM and UF canopies converge.
...Read more
